From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Christoph Berg <cb(at)df7cb(dot)de>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [patch] Adding EXTRA_REGRESS_OPTS to all pg_regress invocations |
Date: | 2013-12-10 03:08:35 |
Message-ID: | 20131210030835.GF2119@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 09:52:27AM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > The change is sane in itself. It won't affect anyone who doesn't use
> > EXTRA_REGRESS_OPTS. Why would we want to make packagers do MORE
> > work?
>
> The patch has been in the Debian/Ubuntu/apt.pg.o packages for some
> time, for 8.3+. I'm attaching the patches used there.
>
> (Sidenote: To enable building of several package flavors in parallel
> on the same machine we use
>
> make -C build check-world EXTRA_REGRESS_OPTS='--host=/tmp --port=$(shell perl -le 'print 1024 + int(rand(64000))')'
>
> so pg_regress' static per-version ports do not conflict. But 9.2's
> contrib/pg_upgrade/{Makefile/test.sh} do not like --port in there, so
> the 9.2 patch has an extra sed hack in there to remove --port for
> pg_upgrade. That bit should probably not be applied for general use.
> The rest is safe, though.)
OK, Christoph has provided a full set of tested patches back to 8.4.
Should I backpatch these? Peter says no, but two others say yes.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2013-12-10 03:13:17 | Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good |
Previous Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2013-12-10 02:32:03 | Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good |