Re: [patch] Adding EXTRA_REGRESS_OPTS to all pg_regress invocations

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Christoph Berg <cb(at)df7cb(dot)de>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [patch] Adding EXTRA_REGRESS_OPTS to all pg_regress invocations
Date: 2013-12-10 06:21:38
Message-ID: 5976.1386656498@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> OK, Christoph has provided a full set of tested patches back to 8.4.
> Should I backpatch these? Peter says no, but two others say yes.

It's hard to paint that as a bug fix, so I'd vote for HEAD only.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2013-12-10 06:30:41 Re: plpgsql_check_function - rebase for 9.3
Previous Message Atri Sharma 2013-12-10 05:43:48 Re: stats for network traffic WIP