| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: removing old ports and architectures |
| Date: | 2013-10-14 13:41:11 |
| Message-ID: | 20131014134111.GB7305@awork2.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2013-10-14 09:40:10 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 5:34 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> - PA-RISC. I think Tom was the remaining user there? Maybe just !gcc.
> >
> > Until pretty recently, there was a PA-RISC machine (not mine) in the
> > buildfarm. I don't see it in the list today though. In any case,
> > HP's compiler has always been a PITA, so no objection to requiring gcc
> > for this platform.
>
> I object to requiring gcc on that platform; we've had recent interest
> in aCC-compiled builds on that platform.
On PA-RISC or Itanic?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2013-10-14 13:42:46 | Re: removing old ports and architectures |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2013-10-14 13:40:10 | Re: removing old ports and architectures |