Re: removing old ports and architectures

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: removing old ports and architectures
Date: 2013-10-14 13:40:10
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaMR6XENcvMH5APppmfhig-Aoiq0NV4Scoc70tzNrUxsw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 5:34 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> - PA-RISC. I think Tom was the remaining user there? Maybe just !gcc.
>
> Until pretty recently, there was a PA-RISC machine (not mine) in the
> buildfarm. I don't see it in the list today though. In any case,
> HP's compiler has always been a PITA, so no objection to requiring gcc
> for this platform.

I object to requiring gcc on that platform; we've had recent interest
in aCC-compiled builds on that platform.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2013-10-14 13:41:11 Re: removing old ports and architectures
Previous Message Robert Haas 2013-10-14 13:36:03 Re: logical changeset generation v6.2