| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: removing old ports and architectures |
| Date: | 2013-10-14 13:42:46 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmobd89QjMop761m+s+p7D3m1z0tCk6W00LMmm=ZTwiXToQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 2013-10-14 09:40:10 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 5:34 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> >> - PA-RISC. I think Tom was the remaining user there? Maybe just !gcc.
>> >
>> > Until pretty recently, there was a PA-RISC machine (not mine) in the
>> > buildfarm. I don't see it in the list today though. In any case,
>> > HP's compiler has always been a PITA, so no objection to requiring gcc
>> > for this platform.
>>
>> I object to requiring gcc on that platform; we've had recent interest
>> in aCC-compiled builds on that platform.
>
> On PA-RISC or Itanic?
Oh, sorry. I think it was Itanium.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Samrat Revagade | 2013-10-14 13:50:01 | Re: psql tab completion for updatable foreign tables |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2013-10-14 13:41:11 | Re: removing old ports and architectures |