| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: WIP: psql default banner patch |
| Date: | 2008-04-22 23:28:20 |
| Message-ID: | 20080422162820.4a96987c@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 19:13:54 -0400
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > * If there is not a version mismatch, psql tells you nothing but
> > ask for help if you need it.
>
> That was NOT part of the agreement. The version line should stay.
Why do we care, if the version matches? Not that I am feeling like
fighting about it but it seems just a waste of bytes. It makes sense if
the version doesn't match.
Joshua D. Drake
--
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-04-22 23:38:38 | Re: WIP: psql default banner patch |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-04-22 23:13:54 | Re: WIP: psql default banner patch |