| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: WIP: psql default banner patch |
| Date: | 2008-04-22 23:56:53 |
| Message-ID: | 480E7B45.6020907@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 19:13:54 -0400
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
>
>> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>>
>>> * If there is not a version mismatch, psql tells you nothing but
>>> ask for help if you need it.
>>>
>> That was NOT part of the agreement. The version line should stay.
>>
>
> Why do we care, if the version matches?
>
You might care if you are working with more than one version at once,
even if the psql you're using matches the server it's talking to.
(That's kinda why I suggested the version as a possible prompt escape)
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-04-23 00:04:20 | Re: WIP: psql default banner patch |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-04-22 23:39:38 | Re: Per-table random_page_cost for tables that we know are always cached |