| From: | "Brendan Jurd" <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: WIP: psql default banner patch |
| Date: | 2008-04-23 00:07:46 |
| Message-ID: | 37ed240d0804221707q3f043c55x7565d637281a7b5f@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Why do we care, if the version matches? Not that I am feeling like
> fighting about it but it seems just a waste of bytes. It makes sense if
> the version doesn't match.
>
To take a field example, I have one site where I run an 8.2 production
cluster, an 8.3 application testing cluster and my a personal 8.4devel
cluster for hacking postgres.
In such an environment, it's *very* useful to have instant feedback on
which server I've just connected to with psql.
Cheers,
BJ
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: http://getfiregpg.org
iD8DBQFIDn3R5YBsbHkuyV0RAjQKAKCLlD3OIdk53D9gI8Kr0BI75WsRSwCfRQLB
30F55MfJN0W6Lzo8mba/yvg=
=fQzl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-04-23 00:09:44 | Re: WIP: psql default banner patch |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-04-23 00:04:20 | Re: WIP: psql default banner patch |