Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Lukas Kahwe Smith <smith(at)pooteeweet(dot)org>
Subject: Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres
Date: 2007-08-08 16:47:37
Message-ID: 200708081847.37556.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www

Am Mittwoch, 8. August 2007 17:44 schrieb Dave Page:
> Barring pgInstaller, it's the first bundled distribution I recall seeing
> available at no cost.

That was not the topic of the announcement, however.

> Thanks. The Windows build was written by me, using the same technology,
> and indeed much of our existing code from pgInstaller. Please detail
> what is unprofessional so I can fix both packages.

I mentioned my concerns in the blog entry. The installer is actually pretty
neat, certainly newbie-friendly, and a lot better than the installer for
EnterpriseDB proper. There is no reason given, however, that the
label "professional" is in any way warranted. But I am aware that that was
not your idea anyway.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-08-08 16:48:11 Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-08-08 16:45:02 Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-08-08 16:48:11 Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-08-08 16:45:02 Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres