Re: ADD/DROPS INHERIT (actually INHERIT / NO INHERIT)

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: ADD/DROPS INHERIT (actually INHERIT / NO INHERIT)
Date: 2006-07-02 16:23:39
Message-ID: 200607021623.k62GNdi08480@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> So this patch was by no stretch of the imagination ready to apply,
> >> but you did it anyway.
>
> > Right. What is your next question?
>
> Perhaps "why is the buildfarm failing" would be appropriate.

Yes, that is appropriate, though it seems Neil's cleanup of the patch
has fixed it now. I see only a single stats failure and an initdb
failure in the buildfarm, neither of which I assume are related to the
patch.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-07-02 16:24:57 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Do a pass of code review for the ALTER TABLE
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-07-02 16:06:48 note about syntax for fillfactor patch

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-07-02 16:34:36 Re: ADD/DROPS INHERIT (actually INHERIT / NO INHERIT)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-07-02 04:06:40 Re: ADD/DROPS INHERIT (actually INHERIT / NO INHERIT)