Re: ADD/DROPS INHERIT (actually INHERIT / NO INHERIT)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: ADD/DROPS INHERIT (actually INHERIT / NO INHERIT)
Date: 2006-07-02 04:06:40
Message-ID: 19824.1151813200@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> So this patch was by no stretch of the imagination ready to apply,
>> but you did it anyway.

> Right. What is your next question?

Perhaps "why is the buildfarm failing" would be appropriate.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2006-07-02 05:17:26 pgsql: Do a pass of code review for the ALTER TABLE ADD INHERITS patch.
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-07-02 03:50:30 Re: ADD/DROPS INHERIT (actually INHERIT / NO INHERIT)

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-07-02 16:23:39 Re: ADD/DROPS INHERIT (actually INHERIT / NO INHERIT)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-07-02 03:50:30 Re: ADD/DROPS INHERIT (actually INHERIT / NO INHERIT)