Re: Bug: Fix Wal replay of locking an updated tuple (WAS: Re: 9a57858f1103b89a5674f0d50c5fe1f756411df6)

From: David Johnston <polobo(at)yahoo(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bug: Fix Wal replay of locking an updated tuple (WAS: Re: 9a57858f1103b89a5674f0d50c5fe1f756411df6)
Date: 2014-03-13 01:37:35
Message-ID: 1394674655343-5795827.post@n5.nabble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Joshua D. Drake wrote
> On 03/12/2014 06:15 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Robert Haas &lt;

> robertmhaas@

> &gt; writes:
>>> Discuss.
>>
>> This thread badly needs a more informative Subject line.
>>
>
> No kidding. Or at least a link for goodness sake. Although the
> pgsql-packers list wasn't all that helpful either.

A link would be nice though if -packers is a security list then that may not
be a good thing since -hackers is public...

A quick search of Nabble and the "Mailing Lists" section of the homepage do
not indicate pgsql-packers exists - at least not in any publicly (even if
read-only) accessible way.

David J.

--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/9a57858f1103b89a5674f0d50c5fe1f756411df6-tp5795816p5795827.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2014-03-13 01:38:24 Re: [PATCH] Store Extension Options
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2014-03-13 01:37:33 Re: 9a57858f1103b89a5674f0d50c5fe1f756411df6