| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Bug: Fix Wal replay of locking an updated tuple (WAS: Re: 9a57858f1103b89a5674f0d50c5fe1f756411df6) |
| Date: | 2014-03-13 01:22:54 |
| Message-ID: | 5321086E.2010801@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/12/2014 06:15 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Discuss.
>
> This thread badly needs a more informative Subject line.
>
No kidding. Or at least a link for goodness sake. Although the
pgsql-packers list wasn't all that helpful either.
What I know is that we have a known in the wild version of PostgreSQL
that eats data. That is bad. It is unfortunate that we just released
9.3.3 but we can't knowingly allow people to get their data eaten. We
look bad.
It appears that this is the specific bug:
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 509-416-6579
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC, @cmdpromptinc
For my dreams of your image that blossoms
a rose in the deeps of my heart. - W.B. Yeats
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2014-03-13 01:25:46 | Re: [PATCH] Store Extension Options |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-03-13 01:15:23 | Re: 9a57858f1103b89a5674f0d50c5fe1f756411df6 |