Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation)

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation)
Date: 2012-03-19 19:49:32
Message-ID: 1332186572.8435.15.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On mån, 2012-03-19 at 02:35 +0000, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> I see your point of view. I suppose I can privately hold onto the test
> suite, since it might prove useful again.

I would still like to have those tests checked in, but not run by
default, in case someone wants to hack on this particular feature again.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2012-03-19 19:49:45 Re: Regarding column reordering project for GSoc 2012
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2012-03-19 19:42:30 Re: patch: autocomplete for functions