| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: patch: autocomplete for functions |
| Date: | 2012-03-19 19:42:30 |
| Message-ID: | 1332186150.8435.14.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On fre, 2012-03-16 at 13:47 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm a bit concerned about whether that's actually going to be useful.
> A quick check shows that in the regression database, the proposed patch
> produces 3246 possible completions, which suggests that by the time you
> get down to a unique match you're going to have typed most of the name
> anyway.
Well, the regression test database is not really an example of real-life
object naming, I think. I tried this out on a couple of real databases
and found it quite handy.
>
> BTW, you should at least exclude dropped columns, I think.
>
Yes.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2012-03-19 19:49:32 | Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation) |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2012-03-19 19:29:55 | Re: Regarding column reordering project for GSoc 2012 |