Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation)

From: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation)
Date: 2012-03-19 02:35:44
Message-ID: CAEYLb_UQ3RmRneaU_9TvSn=M6Cu9L8KXRDw9M3BkV_Wx4dSbHw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 19 March 2012 01:50, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I am *not* a fan of regression tests that try to microscopically test
> every feature in the system.

I see your point of view. I suppose I can privately hold onto the test
suite, since it might prove useful again.

I will work on a pg_regress based approach with a reasonably-sized
random subset of about 20 of my existing tests, to provide some basic
smoke testing.

--
Peter Geoghegan       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message HuangQi 2012-03-19 03:11:28 Re: Gsoc2012 Idea --- Social Network database schema
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-03-19 01:50:34 Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation)