Re: [HACKERS] Last infomask bit

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Last infomask bit
Date: 2007-01-09 22:42:42
Message-ID: 12105.1168382562@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:

> SHOW ALL has:

> log_temp_files | -1 | Log the use of temporary files larger than th

Yeah, but if you do "SET log_temp_files = -1", does it still say that?
I'm worried that will change it to -1024.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-01-09 22:43:39 Re: Mark/Restore and avoiding RandomAccess sorts
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-01-09 22:40:14 Re: [HACKERS] Last infomask bit

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-01-09 22:44:05 Re: [HACKERS] Last infomask bit
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-01-09 22:40:14 Re: [HACKERS] Last infomask bit