Re: [HACKERS] Last infomask bit

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Last infomask bit
Date: 2007-01-09 22:40:14
Message-ID: 200701092240.l09MeE629856@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Patch applied. Thanks.
> > I added a comment about the unused bits in the header file.
>
> Has anyone bothered to measure the overhead added by having to mask to
> fetch or store the natts value? This is not a zero-cost improvement.

SHOW ALL has:

log_temp_files | -1 | Log the use of temporary files larger than th

and pg_settings has:

log_temp_files | -1 | kB | Reporting and Logging / What to Log

Looks OK to me.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-01-09 22:42:42 Re: [HACKERS] Last infomask bit
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-01-09 22:37:40 Re: [HACKERS] Patch to log usage of temporary files

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-01-09 22:42:42 Re: [HACKERS] Last infomask bit
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-01-09 22:37:40 Re: [HACKERS] Patch to log usage of temporary files