Re: [HACKERS] Last infomask bit

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Last infomask bit
Date: 2007-01-09 22:44:41
Message-ID: 200701092244.l09MifO00861@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>
> > SHOW ALL has:
>
> > log_temp_files | -1 | Log the use of temporary files larger than th
>
> Yeah, but if you do "SET log_temp_files = -1", does it still say that?
> I'm worried that will change it to -1024.

You can rest easy tonight. :-)

test=> SET log_temp_files = -1;
SET
test=> SHOW log_temp_files;
log_temp_files
----------------
-1
(1 row)

test=> SET log_temp_files = 1;
SET
test=> SHOW log_temp_files;
log_temp_files
----------------
1kB
(1 row)

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2007-01-10 00:20:01 Re: [HACKERS] SGML index build fix
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-01-09 22:44:05 Re: [HACKERS] Last infomask bit

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Albert Cervera Areny 2007-01-09 23:02:02 Re: Tablespace for temporary objects and sort files
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-01-09 22:44:05 Re: [HACKERS] Last infomask bit