| From: | <adnandursun(at)asrinbilisim(dot)com(dot)tr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 |
| Date: | 2005-05-02 10:01:42 |
| Message-ID: | web-96025707@mail3.doruk.net.tr |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Mon, 2 May 2005 10:11:40 +0200
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>I was under the impression that the specific scenario is
>busy-in-transaction backends continuing to produce and
>send data while the client has disappeared. Why does the
backend ignore network errors
>and keep sending data?
Yes, I think PostgreSQL doesnt know whether client is dead
or live ? Or It knows it but, it keeps to send data..
Best Regards,
Adnan DURSUN
ASRIN Bili?im Hiz.Ltd.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2005-05-02 10:59:21 | Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 |
| Previous Message | adnandursun | 2005-05-02 09:52:55 | Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2005-05-02 10:59:21 | Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 |
| Previous Message | adnandursun | 2005-05-02 09:52:55 | Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 |