Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com>, adnandursun(at)asrinbilisim(dot)com(dot)tr, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Date: 2005-05-02 08:11:40
Message-ID: 200505021011.42278.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Neil Conway wrote:
> The specific scenario this feature is intended to resolve is
> idle-in-transaction backends holding on to resources while the
> network connection times out;

I was under the impression that the specific scenario is
busy-in-transaction backends continuing to produce and send data while
the client has disappeared. Why does the backend ignore network errors
and keep sending data?

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brent Verner 2005-05-02 08:15:36 Re: custom guc vars
Previous Message Oliver Jowett 2005-05-02 06:56:08 Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oliver Jowett 2005-05-02 08:49:07 Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Previous Message Oliver Jowett 2005-05-02 06:56:08 Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1