| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
|---|
| From: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | bgwriter reference to HOT standby |
| Date: | 2013-01-24 07:06:01 |
| Message-ID: | CAMkU=1xhiHePtLMvwpJRikevHxJzFqMNgfnuwMkzgbPWOBxZGg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
The docs on bgworker twice refer to "HOT standby". I don't think that in
either case, the "hot" needs emphasis, and if it does making it look like
an acronym (one already used for something else) is probably not the way to
do it.
Patch to HEAD attached.
Cheers,
Jeff
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| bgworker_hot_standby_doc.patch | text/x-patch | 1.6 KB |
| From: | Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: bgwriter reference to HOT standby |
| Date: | 2013-01-24 07:25:33 |
| Message-ID: | CABOikdNwaQPg=WX-w=yBTQP-83qk___+MRpmb58YiWXRsJaF+Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> The docs on bgworker twice refer to "HOT standby". I don't think that in
> either case, the "hot" needs emphasis, and if it does making it look like an
> acronym (one already used for something else) is probably not the way to do
> it.
I think it should it be "Hot Standby" for consistency. +1 for changing
it from HOT to hot/Hot anyway
Thanks,
Pavan
--
Pavan Deolasee
http://www.linkedin.com/in/pavandeolasee
| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: bgwriter reference to HOT standby |
| Date: | 2013-01-24 08:05:23 |
| Message-ID: | CA+U5nMJjCUR3tCxHG7KjF7kPPcrjdk5piDLT_4ezdXmwhK9wCw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 24 January 2013 07:25, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> The docs on bgworker twice refer to "HOT standby". I don't think that in
>> either case, the "hot" needs emphasis, and if it does making it look like an
>> acronym (one already used for something else) is probably not the way to do
>> it.
>
> I think it should it be "Hot Standby" for consistency. +1 for changing
> it from HOT to hot/Hot anyway
Patch applied. Thanks
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services