Re: bgwriter reference to HOT standby

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: bgwriter reference to HOT standby
Date: 2013-01-24 08:05:23
Message-ID: CA+U5nMJjCUR3tCxHG7KjF7kPPcrjdk5piDLT_4ezdXmwhK9wCw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 24 January 2013 07:25, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> The docs on bgworker twice refer to "HOT standby". I don't think that in
>> either case, the "hot" needs emphasis, and if it does making it look like an
>> acronym (one already used for something else) is probably not the way to do
>> it.
>
> I think it should it be "Hot Standby" for consistency. +1 for changing
> it from HOT to hot/Hot anyway

Patch applied. Thanks

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2013-01-24 08:42:30 Re: BUG #6510: A simple prompt is displayed using wrong charset
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2013-01-24 07:45:36 Re: BUG #6510: A simple prompt is displayed using wrong charset