reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1, take two

Lists: pgsql-hackers
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1, take two
Date: 2010-07-30 21:58:03
Message-ID: AANLkTikjvz3R1jn1pSrDD9oHBc_LYMuS1A8u7qrxeckT@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Here's a second version of the main patch, in which I have attempted
to respond to Tom's concerns/suggestions.

(There is still a small, side issue with numeric_maximum_size() which
I plan to fix, but this patch is the good stuff.)

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

Attachment Content-Type Size
numeric_2b-v2.patch application/octet-stream 13.6 KB

From: Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1, take two
Date: 2010-08-03 16:58:35
Message-ID: AANLkTincnsBoQHBP-FyqP2CBXinDZU=YD0o1iHGKQPDz@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 31 July 2010 07:58, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Here's a second version of the main patch, in which I have attempted
> to respond to Tom's concerns/suggestions.
>
> (There is still a small, side issue with numeric_maximum_size() which
> I plan to fix, but this patch is the good stuff.)
>

Applies fine, compiles fine, passes regression tests, and demonstrates
the same space reduction seen with the previous version of the patch.

Marking Ready for Committer.

Cheers,
BJ


From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1, take two
Date: 2010-08-03 22:03:55
Message-ID: 1739.1280873035@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Here's a second version of the main patch, in which I have attempted
> to respond to Tom's concerns/suggestions.

This version looks fine to me.

regards, tom lane


From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1, take two
Date: 2010-08-03 23:12:20
Message-ID: AANLkTikkVAsCgK3Oq5JQtKHm3OhO7BRZQV1b7koLtX+W@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Here's a second version of the main patch, in which I have attempted
>> to respond to Tom's concerns/suggestions.
>
> This version looks fine to me.

Excellent. Committed.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company