Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1, take two

From: Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1, take two
Date: 2010-08-03 16:58:35
Message-ID: AANLkTincnsBoQHBP-FyqP2CBXinDZU=YD0o1iHGKQPDz@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 31 July 2010 07:58, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Here's a second version of the main patch, in which I have attempted
> to respond to Tom's concerns/suggestions.
>
> (There is still a small, side issue with numeric_maximum_size() which
> I plan to fix, but this patch is the good stuff.)
>

Applies fine, compiles fine, passes regression tests, and demonstrates
the same space reduction seen with the previous version of the patch.

Marking Ready for Committer.

Cheers,
BJ

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Boszormenyi Zoltan 2010-08-03 17:01:48 ECPG dynamic cursor fix for UPDATE/DELETE ... WHERE CURRENT OF :curname
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-08-03 16:45:54 Re: Two problems when using Postgresql8.3.7, Please help me!