| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
|---|
| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Missing info for buildfarm reports |
| Date: | 2005-07-18 04:35:46 |
| Message-ID: | 24753.1121661346@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I'm finding it a bit annoying that the buildfarm results pages will only
show me what the program thinks I need to know. For example, to debug
the current 7.4-branch dblink failures, it'd be awfully useful to
compare the build logs of those systems to the same machines' logs for
the not-broken 8.0 branch. But unless there's a magic back door
somewhere, I can't see either of those logs.
I think the ideal layout for the per-test-run pages would be the short
configuration summary plus links to the individual log files --- all of
them, no matter what the script thinks the outcome is.
regards, tom lane
| From: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Missing info for buildfarm reports |
| Date: | 2005-07-18 07:28:00 |
| Message-ID: | 1670.24.211.165.134.1121671680.squirrel@www.dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane said:
> I'm finding it a bit annoying that the buildfarm results pages will
> only show me what the program thinks I need to know. For example, to
> debug the current 7.4-branch dblink failures, it'd be awfully useful to
> compare the build logs of those systems to the same machines' logs for
> the not-broken 8.0 branch. But unless there's a magic back door
> somewhere, I can't see either of those logs.
>
> I think the ideal layout for the per-test-run pages would be the short
> configuration summary plus links to the individual log files --- all of
> them, no matter what the script thinks the outcome is.
>
We're ahead of you (just) :-) . This feature request was filed a few days
ago - see
http://pgfoundry.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1000368&group_id=1000040&atid=241
It will take a little while though.
cheers
andrew