Lists: | pgsql-hackerspgsql-rrreviewers |
---|
From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-rrreviewers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | CommitFest 2009-09 Plans and Call for Reviewers |
Date: | 2009-09-10 01:13:40 |
Message-ID: | 603c8f070909091813k7d64568ch7b3c5d14f087b8fa@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-rrreviewers |
Folks,
CommitFest 2009-09 is now only days away! I have been having
discussions with a number of people, and the result of those
discussions is that I have agreed to manage the next CommitFest
insofar as patch assignment is concerned. Selena Deckelmann, Stephen
Frost, and Brendan Jurd have agreed to assist with what we're calling
patch-chasing: that is, making sure that discussions around a patch
don't die, and that it gets marked as Commited, Returned with
Feedback, or Rejected in a timely fashion, so that the CommitFest
overall gets closed out in a timely fashion. We're tentatively
looking at dividing up responsibility for patch-chasing by topic, as
follows:
Brendan Jurd: SQL Features, Procedural Languages
Stephen Frost: Security, Contrib, Miscellaneous
Selena Deckelmann: Performance, Clients
Hopefully this plan is acceptable to everyone. If not, please feel
free to reply here.
And that brings me to the next topic. Although I have received many
endorsements of the way that I managed the last CommitFest, for which
I am grateful, I think that the real key to a good CommitFest is to
have a good group of reviewers. We had an excellent group of
reviewers for the last CommitFest and I am hoping that all of those
people will volunteer again. Of course, we also need new reviewers!
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Reviewing_a_Patch
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/RRReviewers
And of course my personal favorite:
http://wiki.postgresql.org/images/5/58/11_eggyknap-patch-review.pdf
Please send me an email (without copying the list) if you are
available to review; feel free to include any information that might
be helpful in assigning you an appropriate patch.
...Robert
From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-rrreviewers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest 2009-09 Plans and Call for Reviewers |
Date: | 2009-09-10 03:48:52 |
Message-ID: | 20090910034852.GD20190@fetter.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-rrreviewers |
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 09:13:40PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> Folks,
>
> CommitFest 2009-09 is now only days away! I have been having
> discussions with a number of people, and the result of those
> discussions is that I have agreed to manage the next CommitFest
> insofar as patch assignment is concerned. Selena Deckelmann,
> Stephen Frost, and Brendan Jurd have agreed to assist with what
> we're calling patch-chasing: that is, making sure that discussions
> around a patch don't die, and that it gets marked as Commited,
> Returned with Feedback, or Rejected in a timely fashion, so that the
> CommitFest overall gets closed out in a timely fashion. We're
> tentatively looking at dividing up responsibility for patch-chasing
> by topic, as follows:
>
> Brendan Jurd: SQL Features, Procedural Languages Stephen Frost:
> Security, Contrib, Miscellaneous Selena Deckelmann: Performance,
> Clients
>
> Hopefully this plan is acceptable to everyone. If not, please feel
> free to reply here.
>
> And that brings me to the next topic. Although I have received many
> endorsements of the way that I managed the last CommitFest, for
> which I am grateful, I think that the real key to a good CommitFest
> is to have a good group of reviewers. We had an excellent group of
> reviewers for the last CommitFest and I am hoping that all of those
> people will volunteer again. Of course, we also need new reviewers!
>
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Reviewing_a_Patch
I'm in :)
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-rrreviewers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest 2009-09 Plans and Call for Reviewers |
Date: | 2009-09-10 15:23:00 |
Message-ID: | 585D61CD-543D-4BA5-873C-A90111AAA6D9@kineticode.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-rrreviewers |
On Sep 9, 2009, at 6:13 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> Hopefully this plan is acceptable to everyone. If not, please feel
> free to reply here.
+1
And I'm available to review again, of course.
Best,
David
From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: CommitFest 2009-09 Plans and Call for Reviewers |
Date: | 2009-09-10 16:23:13 |
Message-ID: | 200909101823.13387.andres@anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-rrreviewers |
Hi,
On Thursday 10 September 2009 03:13:40 Robert Haas wrote:
> Please send me an email (without copying the list) if you are
> available to review; feel free to include any information that might
> be helpful in assigning you an appropriate patch.
I am in.
I dont know yet how much time I will have, but we will see.
Andres
From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-rrreviewers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest 2009-09 Plans and Call for Reviewers |
Date: | 2009-09-10 16:28:23 |
Message-ID: | 200909101828.24086.andres@anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-rrreviewers |
On Thursday 10 September 2009 18:23:13 Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thursday 10 September 2009 03:13:40 Robert Haas wrote:
> > Please send me an email (without copying the list) if you are
> > available to review; feel free to include any information that might
> > be helpful in assigning you an appropriate patch.
>
> I am in.
>
> I dont know yet how much time I will have, but we will see.
I am officially to stupid to correctly use the "Reply" Button (i.e. select the
correct address to reply to).
Andres
From: | Dan Colish <dan(at)unencrypted(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-rrreviewers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest 2009-09 Plans and Call for Reviewers |
Date: | 2009-09-10 18:34:41 |
Message-ID: | 20090910183441.GA22069@funkstrom.spiretech.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-rrreviewers |
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 08:23:00AM -0700, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Sep 9, 2009, at 6:13 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>
>> Hopefully this plan is acceptable to everyone. If not, please feel
>> free to reply here.
>
> +1
>
> And I'm available to review again, of course.
>
> Best,
>
> David
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-rrreviewers mailing list (pgsql-rrreviewers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-rrreviewers
Please count me in.
--
--Dan