Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion

Tom,

> The main downside of testing a snapshot, as I see it, is that the
> snapshot is virtually certain not to be initdb-compatible with either
> the previous release or the upcoming one. Mini-releases would have
> that problem too, and so I don't really see what they add in terms of
> testability.

The main purpose of mini-releases would be to make testing more accessable to
newbies who find anon-CVS intimidating.

However, there's no point in worrying about lowering the barriers of entry
unless we have a program and a coordinator to make some kind of real use of
these newbies' feedback.

Anybody wanna volunteer to be 7.5 testing coordinator?

--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> The main purpose of mini-releases would be to make testing more
> accessable to newbies who find anon-CVS intimidating.

Who said anything about anon-CVS? There are the nightly snapshots
for those who want a tarball.

regards, tom lane

On Wed, 2004-05-19 at 12:55, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Tom,
>
> > The main downside of testing a snapshot, as I see it, is that the
> > snapshot is virtually certain not to be initdb-compatible with either
> > the previous release or the upcoming one. Mini-releases would have
> > that problem too, and so I don't really see what they add in terms of
> > testability.
>
> The main purpose of mini-releases would be to make testing more accessable to
> newbies who find anon-CVS intimidating.
>

FWIW we already do nightly tarballs that people can use to build from if
they want...

What might be handy is an alpha build of the win32 version once the
folks developing it feel it's stable enough to merit such a thing...

Course as Bruce mentioned in a post somewhere 'round here, testing is
not the real deficiency here, people who can help code is.

Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

Robert Treat wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-05-19 at 12:55, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > Tom,
> >
> > > The main downside of testing a snapshot, as I see it, is that the
> > > snapshot is virtually certain not to be initdb-compatible with either
> > > the previous release or the upcoming one. Mini-releases would have
> > > that problem too, and so I don't really see what they add in terms of
> > > testability.
> >
> > The main purpose of mini-releases would be to make testing more accessable to
> > newbies who find anon-CVS intimidating.
> >
>
> FWIW we already do nightly tarballs that people can use to build from if
> they want...
>
> What might be handy is an alpha build of the win32 version once the
> folks developing it feel it's stable enough to merit such a thing...

The Win32 project page already has nightly Win32 builds courtesy of
Magnus.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

Tom,

> > The main purpose of mini-releases would be to make testing more
> > accessable to newbies who find anon-CVS intimidating.
>
> Who said anything about anon-CVS? There are the nightly snapshots
> for those who want a tarball.

Really? Where are they? I'd like to be able to refer people.

--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

Josh Berkus wrote:
> Tom,
>
> > > The main purpose of mini-releases would be to make testing more
> > > accessable to newbies who find anon-CVS intimidating.
> >
> > Who said anything about anon-CVS? There are the nightly snapshots
> > for those who want a tarball.
>
> Really? Where are they? I'd like to be able to refer people.

On the ftp server under /dev.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

On Wed, 19 May 2004, Josh Berkus wrote:

> Tom,
>
> > The main downside of testing a snapshot, as I see it, is that the
> > snapshot is virtually certain not to be initdb-compatible with either
> > the previous release or the upcoming one. Mini-releases would have
> > that problem too, and so I don't really see what they add in terms of
> > testability.
>
> The main purpose of mini-releases would be to make testing more accessable to
> newbies who find anon-CVS intimidating.

what is wrong with the nightly snapshots that are created?

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

On Wed, 19 May 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> The Win32 project page already has nightly Win32 builds courtesy of
> Magnus.

Do you want to setup an scp into the main ftp site so that the mirrors
catch them as well? Might make it easier for ppl to get ahold of it ...

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

Marc,

> what is wrong with the nightly snapshots that are created?

Nothing. I was just clueless that this was set up.

So, the 2nd step is to find a likely victi^H^H^H^Holunteer to coordinate
platform/feature testing among our large population of mailing list users.
Easier said than done ...

--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco