Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion
Date: 2004-05-19 18:02:23
Message-ID: 200405191802.i4JI2NF21838@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Treat wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-05-19 at 12:55, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > Tom,
> >
> > > The main downside of testing a snapshot, as I see it, is that the
> > > snapshot is virtually certain not to be initdb-compatible with either
> > > the previous release or the upcoming one. Mini-releases would have
> > > that problem too, and so I don't really see what they add in terms of
> > > testability.
> >
> > The main purpose of mini-releases would be to make testing more accessable to
> > newbies who find anon-CVS intimidating.
> >
>
> FWIW we already do nightly tarballs that people can use to build from if
> they want...
>
> What might be handy is an alpha build of the win32 version once the
> folks developing it feel it's stable enough to merit such a thing...

The Win32 project page already has nightly Win32 builds courtesy of
Magnus.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeffrey W. Baker 2004-05-19 18:02:29 Re: proposal: be smarter about i/o patterns in index scan
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-05-19 18:00:31 Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion