Re: xlog viewer proposal

Alright, I'm working on a fast prototype using the SRF.

On 6/23/06, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 10:59 -0300, Diogo Biazus wrote:
>
> > On 6/23/06, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > > - give more flexibility for managing the xlogs remotely
> >
> > Not sure what you mean.
> >
> > > - I think it's faster to implement and to have a working and
> > usable
> > > tool.
> >
> > Why do you think that? It sounds like you've got more work
> > since you
> > effectively need to rewrite the _desc routines.
> >
> > Yes, but I don't need to worry with program output, and I have the
> > backend's memory management and error handling.
>
> I'd suggest doing a quick prototype to allow us to evaluate which
> architecture would be preferable.
>
> I'm torn between the good-idea and the safe-minimal-but-definitely in
> 8.2 option.
>
> --
> Simon Riggs
> EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
>
>

--
Diogo Biazus - diogob(at)gmail(dot)com
Móvel Consultoria
http://www.movelinfo.com.br
http://www.postgresql.org.br