| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Diogo Biazus <diogob(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: xlog viewer proposal |
| Date: | 2006-06-23 14:25:19 |
| Message-ID: | 1151072719.2691.1453.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 10:59 -0300, Diogo Biazus wrote:
> On 6/23/06, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > - give more flexibility for managing the xlogs remotely
>
> Not sure what you mean.
>
> > - I think it's faster to implement and to have a working and
> usable
> > tool.
>
> Why do you think that? It sounds like you've got more work
> since you
> effectively need to rewrite the _desc routines.
>
> Yes, but I don't need to worry with program output, and I have the
> backend's memory management and error handling.
I'd suggest doing a quick prototype to allow us to evaluate which
architecture would be preferable.
I'm torn between the good-idea and the safe-minimal-but-definitely in
8.2 option.
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | A.M. | 2006-06-23 14:29:52 | Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-06-23 14:24:56 | Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions) |