Re: 8.0.1 performance question.

From: <alvin(dot)yk(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8.0.1 performance question.
Date: 2005-04-04 16:44:26
Message-ID: d7c78ba105040409444ceacdcc@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc pgsql-performance

Thank you for the quick response. To help me debug what's happening,
can you tell me what's the difference between the 7.4 and 8.0 jdbc
drivers in this regard? Is this something that is newly introduced in
8.0? Or is this something that has always been happening?

Thanks.

On Apr 5, 2005 12:15 AM, Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 alvin(dot)yk(at)gmail(dot)com wrote:
>
> > I see statements below being executed non-stop. Who is triggering these
> > statemetns? Is this normal? What am I doing wrong?
> >
> >
> > 2005-04-04 18:05:00 CST PARSELOG: statement: SELECT attnotnull FROM
> > pg_catalog.pg_attribute WHERE attrelid = $1 AND attnum = $2
> > 2005-04-04 18:05:00 CST PARSELOG: statement: SELECT def.adsrc FROM
> > pg_catalog.pg_class c JOIN pg_catalog.pg_attribute a ON
> > (a.attrelid=c.oid
> > ) LEFT JOIN pg_catalog.pg_attrdef def ON (a.attrelid=def.adrelid AND
> > a.attnum = def.adnum) WHERE c.oid = $1 and a.attnum = $2 AND def.adsrc
> > L
> > IKE '%nextval(%'
>
> These are the results of ResultSetMetaData.isNullable() and
> isAutoIncrement(), which your code is apparently calling. The results of
> these calls are cached on a per ResultSet data. We have discussed
> caching them at a higher level, but couldn't find a way to know when to
> flush that cache.
>
> Kris Jurka
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kris Jurka 2005-04-04 17:05:17 Re: 8.0.1 performance question.
Previous Message Paul Thomas 2005-04-04 16:25:19 Re: Another java connect problem

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Petrilli 2005-04-04 16:51:17 Re: Sustained inserts per sec ... ?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-04-04 16:23:27 Re: Sustained inserts per sec ... ?