| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christopher Petrilli <petrilli(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Sustained inserts per sec ... ? |
| Date: | 2005-04-04 16:23:27 |
| Message-ID: | 26669.1112631807@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Christopher Petrilli <petrilli(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Apr 4, 2005 11:52 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Could we see the *exact* SQL definitions of the table and indexes?
> Of course, this is a bit cleansed, since it's an internal project, but
> only the column names are changed:
Thanks. No smoking gun in sight there. But out of curiosity, can you
do a test run with *no* indexes on the table, just to see if it behaves
any differently? Basically I was wondering if index overhead might be
part of the problem.
Also, the X-axis on your graphs seems to be total number of rows
inserted ... can you relate that to elapsed real time for us?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | alvin.yk | 2005-04-04 16:44:26 | Re: 8.0.1 performance question. |
| Previous Message | Kris Jurka | 2005-04-04 16:15:40 | Re: 8.0.1 performance question. |