Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch

From: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch
Date: 2009-01-16 18:24:42
Message-ID: ad71b65e16de5543298a86fb580d292b@biglumber.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

> I think either "\dfU a*" or "\dfU *.a*" is a sufficiently close
> approximation to that. The behavior you are asking for is essentially
> "I want to pay attention to the search path, except not actually follow
> its rules", which is bogus. Either you want to see the functions you
> can call without schema qualification, or you want to see 'em all ---
> it does no good whatsoever to lie about the visibility.

But that's what \dt and \di and \dv have done since forever, and I've
never heard a single complaint about it.

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
End Point Corporation
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200901161321
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAklw0MwACgkQvJuQZxSWSsj5LQCeIl2j+/fT2v0G6aZ/0UnRcCVl
xUoAnj1OBE8mPL9qJHxo+ETwWSHrfFJj
=vtEm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2009-01-16 18:25:56 Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch
Previous Message Gianni Ciolli 2009-01-16 18:12:08 Re: FATAL: could not open relation pg_tblspc/491086/467369/491103: No such file or directory