Re: Is select a transaction starting statement?

From: Dennis Bjorklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Is select a transaction starting statement?
Date: 2004-09-15 05:14:47
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0409150708040.9559-100000@zigo.dhs.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> It's the same in SQL 99. I think you missed that most of the "direct
> SQL" is specified in part 5 instead of part 2. In SQL 2003 they have
> merged these parts. The relevant section for you in SQL 99 is 4.6.3 in
> part 5.

Good, that explains it all. It never occured to me that this could be in
part 5 "Host Languge Bindings".

--
/Dennis Björklund

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paesold 2004-09-15 11:06:25 Re: Rollback on Error
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-09-15 04:17:35 Re: libpq and prepared statements progress for 8.0