Re: libpq and prepared statements progress for 8.0

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: libpq and prepared statements progress for 8.0
Date: 2004-09-15 04:17:35
Message-ID: 28415.1095221855@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> A bit of context here. The perl DBD::Pg developers are trying to figure out
> how to implement prepared queries sanely. As it stands now they're basically
> writing off both binary prepared queries and SQL based prepared queries as
> basically useless.

Really?

It would be cool if they'd stand up and identify themselves and mention
their concerns to the people who are doing the protocol and libpq work.
I sure haven't ever heard word one from anyone working on DBD::Pg.

I'll restrain myself from any stronger comments...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dennis Bjorklund 2004-09-15 05:14:47 Re: Is select a transaction starting statement?
Previous Message Sailesh Krishnamurthy 2004-09-15 03:49:01 Re: beta1 & beta2 & Windows & heavy load