From: | Dennis Bjorklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pavel Stehule <stehule(at)kix(dot)fsv(dot)cvut(dot)cz>, Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Nested Transactions, Abort All |
Date: | 2004-07-10 07:10:15 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0407100906310.2838-100000@zigo.dhs.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 10 Jul 2004, Gavin Sherry wrote:
> "3) The savepoint identified by S and all savepoints established in the
> current savepoint level subsequent to the establishment of S are
> destroyed."
So the standard savepoints are even more like the subtransactions that
alvaro have implemented then I realised before.
One can not just release an earlier savepoint and keep a later one.
Interesting.
--
/Dennis Björklund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2004-07-10 07:34:26 | Re: Nested Transactions, Abort All |
Previous Message | Gavin Sherry | 2004-07-10 06:49:45 | Re: Nested Transactions, Abort All |