Re: Nested Transactions, Abort All

From: Dennis Bjorklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org>
To: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pavel Stehule <stehule(at)kix(dot)fsv(dot)cvut(dot)cz>, Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Nested Transactions, Abort All
Date: 2004-07-10 07:10:15
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0407100906310.2838-100000@zigo.dhs.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, 10 Jul 2004, Gavin Sherry wrote:

> "3) The savepoint identified by S and all savepoints established in the
> current savepoint level subsequent to the establishment of S are
> destroyed."

So the standard savepoints are even more like the subtransactions that
alvaro have implemented then I realised before.

One can not just release an earlier savepoint and keep a later one.
Interesting.

--
/Dennis Björklund

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Pflug 2004-07-10 07:34:26 Re: Nested Transactions, Abort All
Previous Message Gavin Sherry 2004-07-10 06:49:45 Re: Nested Transactions, Abort All