Re: Pg and Stunnel

From: "Roderick A(dot) Anderson" <raanders(at)acm(dot)org>
To: Dennis Gearon <gearond(at)cvc(dot)net>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Pg and Stunnel
Date: 2003-04-10 20:24:25
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.33.0304101316260.25681-100000@main.cyber-office.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, Dennis Gearon wrote:

> ones to avoid
> ---------------
> http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers

I keep forgetting about this.

> You might try 5433/4

Yeah this makes sense but I wanted to see what others might be using. The
tutorial from the Pg (or friend) site uses 5430 which is already assigned.

I've also considered the high numbers; to quote from the link above:

The Dynamic and/or Private Ports are those from 49152 through 65535

I'll kludge for awhile and gather more evidence of others doin's.

Thanks for the pointer.

Rod
--
"Open Source Software - Sometimes you get more than you paid for..."

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amir Becher 2003-04-10 20:32:47 Re: Corrupt index
Previous Message ISMAILA KANE 2003-04-10 20:14:15 pgsql data file location