| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Roderick A(dot) Anderson" <raanders(at)acm(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Dennis Gearon <gearond(at)cvc(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Pg and Stunnel |
| Date: | 2003-04-10 20:51:12 |
| Message-ID: | 6610.1050007872@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
"Roderick A. Anderson" <raanders(at)acm(dot)org> writes:
> On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, Dennis Gearon wrote:
>> You might try 5433/4
> Yeah this makes sense but I wanted to see what others might be using. The
> tutorial from the Pg (or friend) site uses 5430 which is already assigned.
The 5433/4 numbers could get assigned at any minute, too. That doesn't
mean they'd suddenly be likely to be in use on your site, though. Most
of the protocols with recently-assigned numbers are pretty dang obscure.
Still, I'd lean to using one of the port numbers above 49k. If you have
a conflict, at least no one can accuse you of ignoring published specs.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Camarao, Wagner (v) | 2003-04-10 20:54:39 | (mysql to postgresql) in php functions |
| Previous Message | Amir Becher | 2003-04-10 20:32:47 | Re: Corrupt index |