Re: Re: Proposal/design feedback needed: WITHIN GROUP (sql standard ordered set aggregate functions)

From: Atri Sharma <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Re: Proposal/design feedback needed: WITHIN GROUP (sql standard ordered set aggregate functions)
Date: 2013-09-04 16:31:51
Message-ID: E93ABCBA-7CC4-405F-9597-AF6C3E1A2F4E@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Sent from my iPad

On 04-Sep-2013, at 21:38, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:

> On 7/19/13 11:59 AM, Atri Sharma wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This is our current work-in-progress patch for WITHIN GROUP.
>
> This patch needs to be rebased.
>
This version of patch is quite old.We will be sending an updated patch before the start of September commitfest, with all the points you mentioned taken care of.

Thanks for the points.

Regards,

Atri

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2013-09-04 16:39:12 Re: Eliminating pg_catalog.pg_rewrite.ev_attr
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2013-09-04 16:23:20 Re: [9.4] Make full_page_writes only settable on server start?