Re: FOR KEY LOCK foreign keys

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>
Subject: Re: FOR KEY LOCK foreign keys
Date: 2011-02-15 21:32:36
Message-ID: E1661B84-6931-4A71-9061-52C933A0F165@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Feb 15, 2011, at 1:15 PM, Robert Haas wrote:

>> Yeah, that bug is fixed with the attached, though I am rethinking this
>> bit.
>
> I am thinking that the statute of limitations has expired on this
> patch, and that we should mark it Returned with Feedback and continue
> working on it for 9.2. I know it's a valuable feature, but I think
> we're out of time.

How is such a determination made, exactly?

Best,

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2011-02-15 21:32:45 Re: FOR KEY LOCK foreign keys
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-02-15 21:15:38 Re: FOR KEY LOCK foreign keys