Re: PITR Recovery and out-of-sync indexes

On 3-Oct-07, at 12:46 PM, Richard Huxton wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Brian Wipf <brian(at)clickspace(dot)com> writes:
>>> PG tried to enforce the same LC_COLLATE and LC_CTYPE. On OS X,
>>> the value of en_US.utf8 didn't exist, so I created a soft link
>>> to en_US.UTF-8 in the /usr/share/locale/ directory. When I sort
>>> the values of product_id_from_source on both systems using the
>>> locales in this manner I get different orderings:
>
>>> I can happily live with rebuilding indexes if this is the only
>>> problem I can expect to encounter, and I would still prefer PITR
>>> over replication.
>> The whole notion scares the daylights out of me. If you really need
>> to use PITR between these two particular platforms, use a locale
>> with common behavior --- C/POSIX would work.
>
> Could you run Linux in a virtual-machine in OS X?

That's an idea. Performance-wise though, I think we'd be better off
wiping OS X and installing Linux. As an added bonus, we'll be able to
get way better performance out of our Infortrend S16F-R/G1430 Fibre
to SAS RAID box, which isn't getting near the I/O its capable of
under OS X.

Brian Wipf
ClickSpace Interactive Inc.
<brian(at)clickspace(dot)com>