Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Brendan Jurd" <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch
Date: 2009-01-16 17:37:47
Message-ID: CF82EFCF-0BB3-4A9F-8431-E1D6C051B9BE@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Jan 16, 2009, at 9:35 AM, Tom Lane wrote:

>> So would "\df" then be equivalent to "\dU"? Or am I misunderstanding
>> something?
>
> You mean "\dfU"? Yes, if there's no pattern.

Yeah, that's what I meant. Thanks. +1.

Best,

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2009-01-16 17:38:21 Re: [HACKERS] Question regarding new windowing functions in 8.4devel
Previous Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2009-01-16 17:37:01 Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch