Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Brendan Jurd" <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch
Date: 2009-01-16 17:35:55
Message-ID: 8331.1232127355@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"David E. Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> writes:
> On Jan 16, 2009, at 8:36 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Comments? Does this cover all the cases?

> So would "\df" then be equivalent to "\dU"? Or am I misunderstanding
> something?

You mean "\dfU"? Yes, if there's no pattern.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2009-01-16 17:36:26 Re: SnapshotResetXmin
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-01-16 17:34:34 Re: Question regarding new windowing functions in 8.4devel