Re: Small patch for GiST: move childoffnum to child

From: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Small patch for GiST: move childoffnum to child
Date: 2011-07-15 10:01:16
Message-ID: CAPpHfduxaVYWi17WCP1Lca1x2vn8TwKP-aED6uTZA31ToQPnig@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <
heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:

> Ok, committed this now.
>
Thank you.

> I decided to rename the childoffnum field to "downlinkoffnum". I figured
> it'd be dangerous that the field means something subtly different in
> different versions, if we need to backpatch bug fixes that use that field.

Yes, it seems very reasonable.

------
With best regards,
Alexander Korotkov.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2011-07-15 10:04:44 Re: WIP: Fast GiST index build
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2011-07-15 09:27:40 Re: Small patch for GiST: move childoffnum to child