On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <
heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> Ok, committed this now.
>
Thank you.
> I decided to rename the childoffnum field to "downlinkoffnum". I figured
> it'd be dangerous that the field means something subtly different in
> different versions, if we need to backpatch bug fixes that use that field.
Yes, it seems very reasonable.
------
With best regards,
Alexander Korotkov.