Re: GIN improvements part2: fast scan

From: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)simple-knowledge(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: GIN improvements part2: fast scan
Date: 2013-11-15 06:51:00
Message-ID: CAPpHfdt2uGgD1r+xnHO6SqN=ShgJeJqvWcjnVa2PU2ApP4H=hg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 3:25 AM, Rod Taylor <rbt(at)simple-knowledge(dot)com>wrote:

> I checked out master and put together a test case using a small percentage
> of production data for a known problem we have with Pg 9.2 and text search
> scans.
>
> A small percentage in this case means 10 million records randomly
> selected; has a few billion records.
>
>
> Tests ran for master successfully and I recorded timings.
>
>
>
> Applied the patch included here to master along with
> gin-packed-postinglists-14.patch.
> Run make clean; ./configure; make; make install.
> make check (All 141 tests passed.)
>
> initdb, import dump
>
>
> The GIN index fails to build with a segfault.
>

Thanks for testing. See fixed version in thread about packed posting lists.

------
With best regards,
Alexander Korotkov.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2013-11-15 06:54:25 Re: Improve code in tidbitmap.c
Previous Message Alexander Korotkov 2013-11-15 06:49:37 Re: GIN improvements part 1: additional information