Re: Improve code in tidbitmap.c

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Improve code in tidbitmap.c
Date: 2013-11-15 06:54:25
Message-ID: CAApHDvrD2yuTVJb24zJAmfj-wxwxjHYstCaGgCys_EJJwx9oEg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 12:50 AM, Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp
> wrote:

>
> I think that, as a secondary effect of the patch, the scan would be
> performed a bit efficiently.
>
>
Hi Etsuro,

Would you be able to supply some benchmarks of a work load which benefits
from this change?
Something which compares patched and unpatched versions of head would be
really good.

Regards

David Rowley

> I'll add the patch to the 2013-11 CF. Any comments are welcome.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Best regards,
> Etsuro Fujita
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2013-11-15 06:57:16 Re: Get more from indices.
Previous Message Alexander Korotkov 2013-11-15 06:51:00 Re: GIN improvements part2: fast scan