Re: Review: Non-inheritable check constraints

From: Nikhil Sontakke <nikkhils(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Review: Non-inheritable check constraints
Date: 2011-12-20 04:38:58
Message-ID: CANgU5ZciGMbsSDzxZdErVXiyq_V=t=u=aUcXm1YEFNe0QFf4nw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> But did you see Robert Haas' response upthread? It looks like there's
> still some work to do -- at least some research to determine that we're
> correctly handling all those cases. As the committer I'm responsible
> for it, but I don't have resources to get into it any time soon.
>
>
Yeah, am definitely planning to test out those scenarios and will respond
some time late today.

Regards,
Nikhils

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-12-20 04:52:54 Re: RangeVarGetRelid()
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-12-20 04:13:57 Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe