| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Nikhil Sontakke <nikkhils(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Review: Non-inheritable check constraints |
| Date: | 2011-12-20 02:21:19 |
| Message-ID: | 1324347506-sup-5208@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Nikhil Sontakke's message of lun dic 19 22:32:57 -0300 2011:
> > > PFA, revised version containing the above changes based on Alvaro's v4
> > > patch.
> >
> > Committed with these fixes, and with my fix for the pg_dump issue noted
> > by Alex, too. Thanks.
> >
> Thanks a lot Alvaro!
You're welcome.
But did you see Robert Haas' response upthread? It looks like there's
still some work to do -- at least some research to determine that we're
correctly handling all those cases. As the committer I'm responsible
for it, but I don't have resources to get into it any time soon.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Phil Sorber | 2011-12-20 02:31:10 | Re: WIP patch: Improve relation size functions such as pg_relation_size() to avoid producing an error when called against a no longer visible relation |
| Previous Message | Nikhil Sontakke | 2011-12-20 01:32:57 | Re: Review: Non-inheritable check constraints |