Re: pg_stat_statements: calls under-estimation propagation

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Sameer Thakur <samthakur74(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_stat_statements: calls under-estimation propagation
Date: 2013-12-08 00:00:19
Message-ID: CAM3SWZSv1vEvaGv54c4c-_eeMHC18aD_ZZ3Np054bWJVg7B2jg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> 32-bit buildfarm members are having problems with this patch.

This should fix that problem. Thanks.

--
Peter Geoghegan

Attachment Content-Type Size
fix_32bit_pgss.patch text/x-patch 1.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Kirkwood 2013-12-08 00:06:42 Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2013-12-07 23:50:46 Re: pg_stat_statements: calls under-estimation propagation